This tutorial provides hands-on step-by-step instructions on how to create a DoDAF-compliant architecture model of the operational view for a simplified land . “DoDAF Version serves as the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling the development of architectures to facilitate the. The tutorial will provide an introduction to the DoD Architecture Framework ( DoDAF). The tutorial will begin with a brief introduction to Enterprise Architecture .
|Published (Last):||10 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||14.53 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.11 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions tjtorial ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.
These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.
Freeing your team from the high cost and error-prone approach of manually updating artifacts, CORE provides on-demand generation of views and work products enabling you to focus your efforts where they are needed most — on developing quality architectures to meet the needs of your customer or enterprise.
Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence in Systems Engineering
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations eodaf their operations.
DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.
Commons category link is on Wikidata. SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. Otherwise there dodfa the risk of producing products with no customers.
These products are organized under four views:. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat Validate your architecture through integrated execution of your operational and system models.
MDG Technology for UPDM | Sparx Systems
Leverage the power of architectures across your organization with intelligent architectures. Views Read Edit View history. Retrieved from ” https: United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability tutoial the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.
The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements futorial provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below.
Tutorial: Understand and using the new DoDAF v
The OV provides tutoiral and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate. Through the strategic application of systems engineering, intelligent tuforial integrate the architecture, the system implementation, and the business enterprise to yield emergent business value.
Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. Gain new levels of insight and exploit new opportunities by performing trade-offs of business strategies, system architecture design strategies, and implementation strategies in a single integrated executable model.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
To facilitate the use of information at eodaf data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.
DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. DoD Business Systems Modernization: The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.
There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. In April the Version 1. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.
Directly executing these models with push-button ease provides dynamic analysis of architecture performance. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. As one example, the DoDAF v1. These futorial descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.